Saturday, September 26, 2009

On the street where I live...

... This is pretty much how it looks like today. Fortunately, I live on the third floor of a five-floor condo. Unfortunately, with the waters on the streets below now thigh-high and still rising, I'm also effectively marooned.

I live, by the way, not in some dim, undeveloped corner of the metropolis, but in Makati--the country's ritziest, touted by its mayor as a model of urban progress and development. Where I live is a mere 10- to 15-minute walk to Ayala Avenue. Then again, a friend just texted me to say that Buendia, the next major thoroughfare in the city after Ayala, is now neck-deep in water.

Makati might as well start making the most of it by hiring gondoliers.

Stay safe, wherever you are.

Friday, September 25, 2009

'Not blue, not turquoise, not lapis. It's cerulean.'

That little speech again by the divine Meryl, oops, Miranda Priestly, in The Devil Wears Prada:

This... 'stuff'? Oh... ok. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select out, oh I don't know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you're trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don't know is that that sweater is not just blue, it's not turquoise, it's not lapis, it's actually cerulean. You're also blithely unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves St Laurent, wasn't it, who showed cerulean military jackets?... And then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of 8 different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic casual corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs and so it's sort of comical how you think that you've made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when, in fact, you're wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room. From a pile of stuff.

Now, here's actual, real-life confirmation from the filmmaker R.J. Cutler that those words weren't just a diva-channeling screenwriter's invention. Mr. Cutler “had permission from Vogue's legendary editor, Anna Wintour, to document the process of creating the magazine's September 2007 issue, a fashion-industry bible,” writes film critic Andrew O'Hehir. The result is the “remarkable” documentary The September Issue. From Mr. O'Hehir's interview with Mr. Cutler:

[T]hat breakfast scene in Paris, where Anna and other people from Vogue are meeting with the CEO of Neiman Marcus...

That's Neiman Marcus/Bergdorf Goodman, the largest luxury goods retailer in the country. And yes, they're fundamentally telling Burt Tansky, the CEO, what to put on his shelves.

I was sitting there thinking, “The handful of people in that room are deciding what's going to be sold throughout the fall season."

Right there, they're deciding what people will wear. That's what they do. You know, when the minister of finance for Louis XIV convinced him that France should become a major exporter of fashion, that it should be one of the leading industries, he appointed a minister of fashion. And that minister of fashion would decide where the hemlines were and what the fashion in the court would be, every year. That decision affected the world's fashion because it was exported from France to the rest of the world. This is what Anna is doing! She's sitting there as minister of fashion of the world, with her associates, and declaring what we shall wear.


Eula Valdes leads cast of Tanghalang Pilipino’s A Streetcar Named Desire

Tennesse Williams’ Pulitzer Prize-winning play, “A Streetcar Named Desire,” translated by the late playwright Orlando Nadres into Filipino as “Flores Para Los Muertos”, will be brought to life on stage as Tanghalang Pilipino’s third offering in its 23rd Theater Season, which celebrates “Women of Substance.”

Multi-awarded TV, film and stage director Floy Quintos directs the play, which will be performed in English and Filipino. The cast includes Ana Abad Santos as Blanche in the English version and Eula Valdes as Blanche Dubois in Filipino.

Playing Stanley Kowalski, the role made famous by Marlon Brando in its original staging and film adaptation, are Reuben Uy in English and Neil Ryan Sese in Filipino. Stella Kowalski will be performed by seasoned stage actor Mailes Kanapi in English, and theater newbie Meryll Soriano in Filipino.

Also in the cast are Paolo O’Hara, Jonathan Tadioan, Marjorie Lorico, Paolo CabaƱero, Jerald Napoles, and Tara Cabaero.

Perhaps Williams’ greatest masterpiece, “A Streetcar Named Desire/Flores Para Los Muertos” is rich in characters, dialogue and psychological depth, all of which have challenged many serious artists, beginning with Brando in the first Broadway staging along with Jessica Tandy as Blanche Dubois, and then Vivien Leigh as the faded Southern belle in the movie version.

The play’s recurring theme is the constant and often dangerous conflict between reality and fantasy, actual and ideal. Blanche Dubois, the main character says, “I don’t want realism; I want magic.” Her deception of others and herself is not from malicious intent, but from a heart and spirit broken by adversity and forced to retreat to a kinder, purer time that no longer exists.

“A Streetcar Named Desire/Flores Para Los Muertos” opens on October 2, 2009 at the CCP Tanghalang Aurelio Tolentino and runs for four weekends until October 25, 2009.

It will be performed in English from October 2 to 11 and in Filipino from October 16 to 25; Fridays at 8 pm, Saturdays at 3 pm and 8 pm, and Sundays at 3 pm. Special shows are available upon reservation. For ticket inquiries, call Tanghalang Pilipino 8323661, Ticketworld 8919999 or the CCP Box Office 8323704.


Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Blog a play, win a Sony Ericsson phone

Thank you for the birthday greetings, dear friends. Moving on...


The stakes just got much bigger with Sony Ericsson's very generous offer to give away a brand-new SE C903 Cyber-shot phone as the first prize for any contest I can think of in this blog--and I've got one now. Thank you, Sony Ericsson. To spread the largesse, I'm also widening the coverage of the new contest and throwing in prizes for the second and third spots as well. Here goes:

The rules
1. Watch any or all of the six plays currently running or about to open in Manila in a few days (Trumpets' NOAH, Dulaang UP's Amphitryon, PETA's Ismael at Isabel, Tanghalang Pilipino's Madonna Brava ng Mindanao, Tanghalang Ateneo's Metamorphoses and Atlantis Productions' Spring Awakening) and blog about them--in whatever way you choose.

You may write about only one play, or all of them, in English or Filipino. Again, no editorial input from me; what you write is entirely your call. I'll be looking for two things: quality of insight and clarity of expression--how compelling your views are and how well you express them. Whether I agree with your point or not will not be a factor. (See our last blog contest, on the Virgin Labfest 5, for pegs.)

2. Once your entry is up, leave a comment/link here (you may want to bookmark this post for easy retrieval). Since five of the six plays have started their runs, those who've blogged about them before this announcement are free to likewise enter their entries in this contest. For Multiply users, leave a comment/link in my Multiply site.

3. The entries will be winnowed down to the Top Three. I may or may not ask other people to help me choose the winning entries.

4. The contest runs from today until Monday, October 19, by which time all five plays would have finished their runs. Winners will be announced on or before Wednesday, October 21, through e-mail and an entry here.

The covered plays
1. Tanghalang Ateneo's Metamorphoses runs until September 26 at the Rizal Mini Theater, Ateneo de Manila University. For tickets, call Ivanna Pacis 0905-2412107 or e-mail marketing@tanghalangateneo.org.

2. Dulaang UP's Amphitryon runs until September 26 at the Wilfrido Ma. Guerrero Theater, 2nd floor, Palma Hall, UP Diliman, Q.C. For tickets, call 9261349, 4337840, 9818500 local 2449 or 2451.

3. Trumpets' NOAH (No Ordinary Aquatic Habitat) runs until September 27 at the Meralco Theater. For tickets, call 6354478, 0917-8842105, 0932-2705639 or Ticketworld 8919999.

4. Tanghalang Pilipino's Madonna Brava ng Mindanao runs until October 11 at CCP's Tanghalang Huseng Batute. For tickets, call 8323704, 8919999, 8321125 locals 1620 and 1621, telefax 8323661 or e-mail ccptanghalan@yahoo.com

5. PETA's Ismael at Isabel runs until October 17 at the PETA Theater Center, Quezon City. For tickets, call 4100821, 7256244, 0917-8044428 or e-mail petampro@yahoo.com

6. Atlantis Productions' Spring Awakening opens this Friday, September 25, and runs until October 18 at the Carlos P. Romulo Auditorium, RCBC Plaza, Makati. For tickets, call 8927078 or 8401187.

The prizes
First prize: Sony Ericsson C903 Cyber-shot phone (5-megapixel camera, GPS for geo-tagging, auto rotating 2.4” display, TV-out function, Face Detection, Smile Shutter, Best Pic, Media Go entertainment organizer--full product overview here), currently retailing at P18,000+.

Second prize: An Astoria Plaza gift certificate entitling the winner to overnight accommodations for two persons at a one-bedroom suite, with free breakfast. The GC is good until November 3, 2009. More about Astoria Plaza's full-serviced residential suites here.

Third prize: Brand-new hardbound edition of Dan Brown's latest blockbuster novel, The Lost Symbol.

Additional prizes for honorable mentions might come in, like the last time. Who knows? Do help me inform everyone about this contest and the plays covered by reposting in your blogs and/or mentioning in your Facebook and Twitter.

Enjoy the show/s, and start blogging now!

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Because the baby is now... er, 39


Something from Ralph Waldo Emerson:

To laugh often and love much;
to win the respect of intelligent people
and the affection of children;
to earn the approbation of honest critics
and endure the betrayal of false friends;

To appreciate beauty; to find the best in others;
to give oneself;
to leave the world a bit better
whether by a healthy child, a garden patch,
or a redeemed social condition;

To have played and laughed with enthusiasm
and sung with exultation;
to know even one life has breathed easier
because you have lived--

This is to have succeeded.

Damn hard yardstick, but I'm trying.

Bringing pleasure back to reading

Exie Abola in the Philippine Star, perfectly illustrating by way of his own writing what he calls “The pleasure of beauty, in language and in craft”:

One thing we--teachers, parents, and everyone else concerned about reading — need to do is put pleasure back in the reading experience. Or rather, we need to validate it. We need to tell our students, children, each other, ourselves, that it’s fine to read primarily for pleasure. I know my students already do. “Read for pleasure” is advice I don’t need to give them, because they already believe it. One of the common gripes we teachers of literature make about our students is that they don’t read, but I’ve found that it’s not true. At the start of every schoolyear I give out, in all my first-year lit classes, a survey sheet in which I ask what they like to read. I’ve found that they do read. It’s just that their tastes tend to be narrow. Some read only light fantasy. Others read only chick-lit. Still others read only manga (Japanese illustrated fiction, very much like comic books). This year the Twilight books were a frequent answer. They don’t need me to tell them to read for pleasure. What they need from me is to say it’s okay to admit it.

What they also need from me--and this is more important--is to expand their definition of pleasure. The problem is not that we value pleasure so much, it’s that we define it too narrowly. Most perniciously, we think that pleasure should come easily. If something is supposed to be fun, it shouldn’t have to make us work. It definitely shouldn’t have to make us think. And because we get our pleasures so easily now, we demand that they always be easy.

But pleasure comes in degrees and in wide varieties. There is the pleasure of figuring out “whodunit” (as any reader of Agatha Christie or Raymond Chandler knows). There is the pleasure of trying to solve puzzles (as Dan Brown fans do). There is the giddiness of a romance novel, the fright of horror. But how about the pleasures we overlook? The pleasure of beauty, in language and in craft. The pleasure of characters rendered as if they were real people, of places vividly evoked. The pleasure of plumbing singular experiences, even sad and painful ones, of sharing the lives of the sorrowful, the lonely, the damned. There is the pleasure of insight, of ideas. The pleasure of contemplating the unfathomable evil and goodness in the human heart. But these pleasures often take some experience to arrive at, and some effort too.

QC government holds 3 arts competitions

“QC@70,” a month-long celebration of the seven-decade founding of Quezon City, announces the holding of three arts competitions: “Songs Beyond,” “Sining Biswal” and “Seeing Beauty.”

The first competition, “Songs Beyond,” seeks to discover and promote talented singers and musical composers. Singers and composers will be given the opportunity to showcase their singing prowess and skills in musical composition. Three finalists will be selected from each district of QC, while 22 finalists will be chosen as contenders in the musical composition category.

“Sining Biswal,” the second arts competition, invites all amateur visual artists to render on canvas their vision of a “future perfect” Quezon City. Visual artists who are interested to join must have not made a solo exhibit and must be 16 years old and above.

Finally, “Seeing Beauty” is a photography contest that seeks to honor the best photographs of amateur and professional photographers who have captured--either in black and white, sepia tone or full color images--significant and historical landmarks, structures, installations or subjects that can be found all over Quezon City.

Deadline for submission of entries for the three competitions is Sept. 25. “QC@70” is a project spearheaded by the Office of Mayor Sonny Belmonte.


Sunday, September 20, 2009

A conversation with Brillante Mendoza, part 2


[Part 1 is here.]

In which the Cannes-winning director answers more questions, among them:

1. What's his answer to charges that his movies traffic in “poverty porn”?

2. In what way is Kinatay a “commentary” on the old “massacre” films, as he has mentioned?

3. Has his Cannes triumph sunk in? How has it changed his life?

4. What does he think of the larger Filipino audience that has been resistant, so far, to his movies and his particular brand of filmmaking?




The Fabcasters, on how to get hitched. (As if!)

Not that we're the gurus when it comes to gay dating and stuff. We wish! But having been asked our thoughts on a long list of questions sent in by an MGG reader, we gave it a shot, though I'm not sure our answers made any coherent sense. Well, blame the alcohol and cheese. If you can't dig our so-called tips, just laugh with us.

LISTEN (30 mins):
Download this episode (right click and save - 28.8 MB)

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Crazy Q&A with Kimmy Dora, aka Eugene Domingo

“Ang hirap ng pinapa-internalize niyo sa akin, Audrey Hepburn, parang fantasy.” (Dress by Kate Torralba)

Inquirer Super editor Pam Pastor and her young editorial team were so taken in by the surprise comedy hit Kimmy Dora that they called anyone and everyone to score a Q&A with newly-minted star Eugene Domingo. They didn't stop there; they also styled her up in various guises--as Audrey Hepburn, for one (see top photo)--adding to the super-fun spread that will greet you in today's Inquirer.

Produced for P20 million, Kimmy Dora has now reportedly grossed P80 million--and this without any major TV advertising, only frenzied word of mouth and an innovative campaign via Facebook (16,000 fans now on FB!). “No doubt about it--Eugene Domingo is now a star, something she still can’t wrap her head around,” says the feature piece. And it couldn't have happened to a more deserving talent, who also happens to be one of the most endearing, reliable and hardworking in the industry.

Money quote: “Naging number one naming promo tool ang Internet, word-of-mouth. Hindi kami nagconcentrate sa mga limitations kundi kung ano’ng kaya namin. May isang araw na ‘yung promotion ko nagsimula sa umaga sa dalawang Catholic schools. Sa tanghali nag-E-Live ako. Sa hapon dalawang mall tour, isa sa Market! Market!, isa sa SM Molino sa Cavite. Tapos nag-Cool Center ako. Pagkatapos nagpunta pa ako sa Bed sa Malate. So nagsimula ako sa Catholic school, natapos ako sa gay bar. (laughter)”

And of his kissing scene with Dingdong Dantes: “[N]ung close-up na sabi ni Direk [Joyce Bernal], 'Uge, dito ipakita mo talaga na sasakmalin mo talaga. ‘Di ba todo na ‘yung pangatlo, parang ‘yung janitor fish sa aquarium? (laughter). Pinaalam ko yun kay Dingdong. Sabi ko, 'Darling, ‘yung susunod na kiss ko sa iyo todo na ‘yun ah.' 'Oo, sige, sige.' Parang nabundol ‘yung ngipin ko sa sobrang lakas. Sabi ko, parang dumugo na yata yung gilagid ko. Sabi ni Dingdong, 'Ako parang basa itong buo...' Parang basa raw iyung hanggang dito sa ilong niya. (laughter).”

There's a whole lot more to this laugh trip of an interview (plus more giggles in a sidebar Q&A with Kimmy Dora writer and Eugene's best friend Chris Martinez). Go grab your copy of today's paper--yep, the print edition, with the full visuals. I tell you, it isn't the same reading it online.

FUNNY FACE. Trench coat by Kate Torralba, feather cap, Tessa Prieto’s, shoes by Schu

[PHOTOGRAPHY: JILL LEJANO/ STYLING: LUIS CARLO SAN JUAN/ MAKEUP: MADGE LEJANO of the makeup studio/ HAIR: JOEL ESTRELLES of the makeup studio/ SPECIAL THANKS TO JOLLIBEE AND SHAKEY’S/ Photos courtesy of Philippine Daily Inquirer]

PLUS: “Hello, is this me calling?”--Eugene Domingo in Chris Martinez's 2006 play on the call-center life, Welcome to IntelStar.

Go figure

“[In] Iran... homosexuals have been persecuted on a more or less regular basis since the Islamic revolution. The mere suspicion that someone may have committed "unnatural acts" is enough for that person to be sentenced to a flogging in Iran. If caught more than once, the person in question can be sentenced to death... As a result of this situation thousands of gays and lesbians have fled Iran.

HOWEVER, “[t]he persecution of gays has led to a boom in demand for sex-change operations in Iran. More operations of this kind are carried out in the Islamic Republic than anywhere else in the world apart from Thailand. These procedures were approved by Ayatollah Khomeini himself in 1983. Khomeini defined transsexuality as a disease that can be healed by means of an operation. Since then thousands of people have requested this kind of treatment and the Iranian government even covers part of the costs.

“'Family members and physicians urge homosexuals to have operations to normalize their sexual orientation,' Parsi says. This way it was possible for a high-ranking Shiite religious scholar to finance his secretary's physical transformation into a woman and then to marry him.”

-- “The Gay Sons of Allah: Wave of Homophobia Sweeps the Muslim World”, by Juliane von Mittelstaedt and Daniel Steinvorth, in Der Spiegel

Two young men under the ages of 18 face execution in northern Iran in 2005, accused of raping boys. Gay men face persecution in the Islamic Republic and many are opting for sex-change operations.

[Photo/caption: Der Spiegel]

Friday, September 18, 2009

A conversation with Brillante Mendoza, part 1


THE Brillante Mendoza visited the office two weeks ago (pre-Venice Film Festival) to screen his contentious film Kinatay for editors and employees, and afterwards, to answer questions from those of us who were eager to discuss the film, talk about movies and basically just inhale the oxygen around the 2009 Cannes Film Festival Best Director. Bayani San Diego has the report today in Inquirer Entertainment on some of the questions we were able to throw at Mr. Mendoza, who remains a strikingly soft-spoken, unassuming fellow despite his celebrated stature in contemporary world cinema. I was able to record the interview on high-definition video, and it makes for a fascinating peek into the mind and aesthetics of a visionary filmmaker who's rewriting the rules in his dogged, against-the-grain way. Part 1 consists of two clips, both under 10 minutes (YouTube limitation). Part 2, also two clips, will follow. An excerpt from the interview:

How long was the script of “Kinatay”?
20 pages, with 43 sequences. A regular script would have about 100 sequences. But since my French producer (Didier Costet) knew how I worked, he wasn’t bothered by the slim script. (Lead actor and co-producer) Coco Martin initially thought “nothing was happening” in the script.

Before the start of the shoot, I didn’t know yet how I would orchestrate everything. Basta everything was in my mind.

What was clear to me was that I wanted the viewers to feel disturbed, afraid and unsafe after watching the movie.

Why was that your goal?
Because that’s reality. We just refuse to see it. We’re too blinded by a false sense of security.




PLUS: Reviews of Kinatay--theater director Nonon Padilla's here (published in Adobo Magazine), online film critic Oggs Cruz's here.

Tanghalang Pilipino's Madonna Brava ng Mindanao opens Sept. 18

The second in TP’s 23rd Season of plays that celebrate “Women of Substance,” “Madonna Brava ng Mindanao” opens on September 18, 2009 at the Tanghalang Huseng Batute (Studio Theater), Cultural Center of the Philipppines.

Described by TP Artistic Director Nanding Josef as “a relevant and exciting new production,”
“Madonna Brava ng Mindanao” features award-winning actress Shamaine Centenera Buencamino as Madonna Brava, together with members of the TP Actors' Company and actors from Mindanao.

Based on Bertolt Brecht’s
“Mother Courage and Her Children”, the play is translator Don Pagusara’s paean to the German master. Madonna Brava is a kind of ubiquitous witness to the rough and tumble of the unending Mindanao war, which she follows and exploits with the flamboyance of a trader and the bravado of a woman who needs to survive with her family in a milieu of uncertainty, terror and death.

Her multicab, a veritable mobile mini-bazaar loaded with an assortment of wares that cater to soldiers, takes her and her tri-ethnic brood--a Moro, a Christian and a
“lumad”--to long distances and unseemly spaces of war-torn Mindanao.

Under the direction of Nestor Horfilla, founding artistic director of Kaliwat Theater Collective, Inc. of Davao, the production also features music composed and arranged by Mebuyan.

“Madonna Brava ng Mindanao” will run for four weekends, from September 18 to October 11, with evening shows at 8 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and matinees at 3 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Tickets at P600 and P300 are available at the CCP Box Office (8323704) and Ticketworld (8919999) outlets.

For more information, call Tanghalang Pilipino 8321125 locals 1620 and 1621/telefax: 8323661, e-mail ccptanghalan@yahoo.com or visit www.tanghalangpilipino.com.



Thursday, September 17, 2009

In Hamlet, the word made fresh

Jude Law, on Hamlet's “To be or not to be” and other soliloquies: “The reason they’re so famous is because they’re beautifully written and incredibly powerful pieces of dialogue. Never underestimate the power of these lines. Our language is littered with words and phrases from this play, and we use them because we have not, in 400 years, found a better way of putting things.”

Guy watches Hamlet, walks out, muttering: “It's just a bunch of clichĆ©s.” True, because what we now call clichĆ©s were, in fact, first heard in--and eventually made popular by--Shakespeare's play. “So many of the memorable expressions in Hamlet have become proverbial,” said Richard Lederer in his book The Miracle of Language. “In that one play alone were born:”

brevity is the soul of wit
there's the rub
to thine own self be true
it smells to heaven
the very witching time of night
the primrose path
though this be madness, yet there is method in it
dog will have his day
the apparel oft proclaims the man
neither a borrower nor a lender be
frailty, thy name is woman
something is rotten in the state of Denmark
more honored in the breach than the observance
hoist with his own petard
the lady doth protest too much
to be or not to be
sweets for the sweet
to the manner born
more in sorrow than in anger

Amazing fact, isn't it?

PLUS: A different breed of princes--America's only royals, now gone:

Robert, John and Ted Kennedy on the beach in Palm Beach, 1957. [Photo: Douglas Jones/Look, via John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, via NYTimes]

They're inviting you to Spring Awakening

What an attractive cast. Can't wait to see what these kids can do.



“Spring Awakening” is part of Atlantis Productions’ 10th Anniversary and is directed by Chari Arespacochaga. An actress, choreographer and educator, Chari watched the show Off-Broadway even before it won any awards. An usher did not show up for work and Chari was offered to take the job in exchange for a free seat. “I left the theater in a daze,” she says. “I knew I wanted to direct this musical!” [from Walter Ang's feature in the Inquirer]

It runs September 25-October 18 at the Carlos P. Romulo Auditorium, RCBC Plaza, Makati. Call 8927078 or 8401187. Due to explicit content and some nudity, parental discretion is advised.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Heralds of cinematic delights--or sometimes drivel


From the ultra-cool design and brand blog idsgn: “Since the early days of cinema, artists have carefully designed film titles to captivate audiences and set the film’s mood. To bring attention to this often overlooked art form, Dutch graphic designer (and movie lover) Christian Annyas has put together The Movie Title Stills Collection. The website collects and neatly organizes film titles by decade, from the 1920’s to present.”

A truly fascinating and lovingly assembled compendium--manna for cinephiles like you and me. Go find your fave movie titles!


Twitter versus Tweetams

Post-ZsaZsa Zaturnnah, programmers Juniffer and Zoorla are the new denizens of comic-book writer Carlo Vergara's zany, endearingly campy imagination. They haven't appeared in comic-book panels yet, but their hilarious conversations make for worthwhile trips to The Carver's House. Their first appearance was in Kalabanin ang Google at Facebook. Now they're back with a new bĆŖte noire in Kalabanin ang Twitter, where this back-and-forth ensues:

Programmer Zoorla
Well, dear, meron na rin akong ginawa na siguradong panalo din. Isang microblogging website na makikipagbanggaan sa Twitter... (fires on his laptop and goes online)

Programmer Juniffer
Ay... ah... Tweetams?

Programmer Zoorla
Koraks and stones!! Tweetams is the newest and most advanced microblogging website.

Programmer Juniffer
Eh papaano seseryosohin ang Tweetams mo, eh, para ka lang nagpapa-kyut?

Programmer Zoorla
Darling, ano ba ang ginagawa ng karamihan sa Twitter?

Programmer Junnifer
Ah...Nagpapakyut?

Programmer Zoorla
Koraks and boulders!! Huwag na nating lokohin ang sarili natin na kesyo nagma-microblogging tayo para iligtas ang mundo sa global warming, 'noh?! Nagpapakyut ka lang naman, e di harap-harapan na ang pagpapakyut. At anong microblogging site ang bagay sa mga chronic na nagpapakyut? Tweetams.


The complete chorvahan here. Bitoy and Ogie as Juniffer and Zoorla--what do you think?

Monday, September 14, 2009

RIP for the iPod?

Slate's technology columnist Farhad Manjoo says it is--though only for the better:

“The new Nano [the one with the video camera] signals an inevitable, though still remarkable, transition: The iPod is dead. I don't mean the name won't stick around or that people will stop buying Apple's devices. Rather, the sun is setting on what the iPod once was—a device you bought to play digital music. Nobody knows when Apple will add Internet connectivity to the Nano, but you'd be a fool to bet against it happening in the next three years. And with that, the floodgates: Once the Nano gets the Internet, why not the App Store? And why not GPS, a compass, and a touch screen? At the moment, these options are too expensive to add to a tiny device, but tech is always getting cheaper and smaller. The video camera is just the start—it won't be long before the Nano, like the iPod Touch and the iPhone, turns into what Jobs calls a 'general-purpose device.' The rest of us have another name for such a machine: a computer.”

From closet case to Fabcast guest

That's Kiko, a young man who once wrote Migs a letter saying he didn't have “a single gay bone in my body”--at least according to his friends--but in truth was slowly asphyxiating inside the closet. His radical solution? Accept himself, embrace the light... and guest in our Fabcast--the first after Migs' return from his US trip, and therefore extra-rowdy. Way to go, brothah!

LISTEN: (33 minutes)
Download this podcast (right click and save - 32 MB)

PLUS: The Fabcasters' backstory, via the invaluable McVie.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Seven arts, one Imelda, 12 people who remembered

Philippine Daily Inquirer, 9.13.2009

[Note: I had no plans of going to the tribute concert to Imelda Marcos at the CCP last Friday, but was asked by the boss to go and report on the event. Well, here it is, on the front page of today's Inquirer.]


A GRAND TOTAL OF 12 PEOPLE showed up to protest “Seven Arts, One Imelda,” the lavish tribute the Cultural Center of the Philippines staged last Friday for its founding chair, Imelda Marcos, the widow of the dictator Ferdinand Marcos.

The protesters, chanting “Never again to Martial Law!” were reportedly led by the son of the late National Artist for Theater and Literature Rolando Tinio—an interesting twist, given that Tinio’s Teatro Pilipino was a resident company of the CCP in Imelda’s time, and Tinio himself enjoyed a close relationship with the former First Lady. (See related story on page F2.)

The protesters were kept to the rain-soaked driveway by a police contingent, while an oblivious crowd—perfumed, coiffed, bejeweled and botoxed, many of them familiar faces from the Marcos dispensation—kept the CCP lobby humming in anticipation of the arrival of the woman for what promised to be the evening of her biggest social rehabilitation yet after the little incident that was Edsa 23 years ago.

When Imelda arrived, in a purple and red gown accented with a swarm of rubies on her neck, she glided in as if she’d never left—grand, commanding, a magnet for photographers, quickly attended to by friends, courtiers and fans eager for a handshake, a photo-op or a mere flicker of recognition from her still-beautiful face.

Whether she saw the demonstrators outside, and what she thought of them—nobody dared ask. It was left to the CCP’s new vice president/artistic director, Raul Sunico, to bring the matter up ever so delicately, obliquely, in his welcome remarks.

“We want to give this tribute irrespective of political color,” he said. “Let art and politics be separate.”

Elegant staging
The elegantly staged program that followed largely kept to that promise—no speeches, no overt hagiography, only good-old fashioned musical performances by a phalanx of first-rate Filipino artists, many of them beneficiaries of the Madame’s support during her time, as Sunico himself acknowledged.

Among the performers featured in Act 1, each of whom generously kept his or her appearance to a single number, were pianists Cecile Licad and Sunico, violinists Joseph Esmilla and Coke Bolipata, flutist Antonio Maigue, classical singers Aileen Espinosa Cura, Camille Lopez Molina, Rachelle Gerodias and Jonathan Velasco, accompanied by the Philippine Philharmonic Orchestra under the baton of Chino Toledo.

Licad dazzled with a complex rendering of Liszt’s “St. Francis de Paula Walking on the Water,” as did Esmilla with his rousing fiddling on De Sarasate’s “Introduction Et Tarantelle, Op. 43.” The singers—especially Lopez-Molina with a magnificent “O don fatale” from Verdi’s “Don Carlo”—provided rich vocal performances.

One was left to wonder, though, whether the choice of song said something more than it did. In the opera, it was sung by a lady-in-waiting who betrays her queen, with lyrics like “O mia Regina, io t’immolai al folle error di questo cor” (“O my Queen, I sacrificed you to the crazed passion of my heart”). Does Imelda know Italian? If she did, what would she have made of the queenly references?

There was evidence that the concert, scripted by Floy Quintos and directed by Alexander Cortez, tried bending over backwards precisely to skirt the charged image of Imelda as a self-styled queen, when the CCP was more like her private salon-cum-music chamber and the artists in her stable at her beck and call for command performances.

Suitably Imeldific
Act 2, for instance, called “Muse and Madness” (“How suitably Imeldific, don’t you think?” said Bongbong Marcos, Imelda’s son, in his introduction, drawing a flutter of nervous laughter from the crowd), presented Imelda not in the high noon of her reign, but as a young girl awakening to “her artistic instincts, inspirations and flights of creativity.”

Nearly 300 performers, composed of 10 choirs plus Ballet Philippines, The Bayanihan Dance Company, solo performers Lisa Macuja, Candice and Carissa Adea and mezzo soprano Clarissa Ocampo (splendid), were conscripted to give life to an abstract, impressionistic suite of songs, dances and images, performed to an original score by Ryan Cayabyab.

Cayabyab’s 28-minute suite was remarkably flexible, accommodating everything from snippets of ragtime to bars that evoked Gershwin’s “Rhapsody in Blue,” from balletic moments—for Macuja and Adea’s shared moment on stage, classical and modern dance lashed together rivetingly—to soaring choral melodies—Filipino in the case of the children’s choirs, full-throttle Latin for the adult ones. (Just wondering: What were these kids taught about the woman they were honoring?)

Naive representation
Of course, this wouldn’t be Imelda without the ternos. They came out first draped on mannequins wheeled around by dancers, followed by amazonian models wearing some of the most stunning, and also the most outlandish, versions ever made of the iconic costume—a few of them you couldn’t imagine Imelda herself wearing. The ersatz fashion show featured gowns by Pitoy Moreno, Inno Sotto, Noli Hans, Finina Tugade, Joey Samson, Paul Cabral, Steve de Leon, Tippi Ocampo and the late Joe Salazar.

The musical suite ended with Imelda remaining a dreamy young girl—at best a naive representation that clashed with the picture and legacy of the baroque woman now being feted.

That girl, after all, would grow up to become one of the country’s—the world’s—most powerful women, hoarding riches that enabled her to become a much-flattered patron of the arts. In an age, lest we forget, when royal patronage had gone the way of the Medicis, in a nominal republic desperately poor even then, where any arts endowments should have come, if not from private funds, then at least from a public purse well accounted for. And, certainly, not for one’s bloated sense of self-glorification or the deodorizing of a corrupt regime.

In the end, the concert, fetchingly mounted and performed as it was, would have to return to that fundamental question: For whom is all this art? For whom, in fact, is this institution that claims to be the cultural center of the entire Philippines? (The concert was a strictly by-invitation-only affair.)

Jeremy Barns, in his effusive write-up on Imelda and her CCP vision in the concert program, wrote what must qualify as the understatement of the century—Edsa, the first People Power Revolution, the most significant contemporary event in the nation’s history, buried in layers of pained elision: “Of course, different things moved in different directions, and as time passed, the vision of achieving greatness, which later was reformulated into that of a New Society, lost the support of the people. The country went into crisis. Ultimately, the government of Ferdinand Marcos came to a sudden end, and he and Mrs. Marcos exited the stage on which they had long held forth.”

He got one phrase right: “held forth”—as in reigned, like Their Imperial Majesties, summoning subject, factotum and artist alike to their presence with a wave of a hand. Unacknowledged in the jubilant celebration of Filipino artistry that was “Seven Arts, One Imelda” was that dark, chafing fact.

For a truer picture of the context and history from which all these art and art-making were forged, one must go back to those wet, forlorn voices outside. In the proper scheme of things, the equation should stand: Seven arts, one Imelda—and 12 people who remembered.

[Photo: Lyn Rillon/Philippine Daily Inquirer]

Friday, September 11, 2009

Marunong ka bang magbilang, Prospero Pichay?


[Prospero] Pichay downplayed the supposed public clamor that apparently convinced [Noynoy] Aquino to join the presidential race.

“I cannot understand why you would call it a euphoria,” he said. “It’s euphoria when you have one million people rejoicing in the streets. But it’s not when you have only 5,000 people wearing yellow shirts.”

Pichay [a vice president of the Lakas-Kampi-CMD party] said the supposed clamor was “felt only in Metro Manila and ABS-CBN.”



[Photomontage of scenes from the Cory Aquino funeral by Ferdinand Gagelonia of the blog At Midfield]

Auditions for Dulaang UP's Mary Stuart/Maria Stuarda

Dulaang UP is holding auditions for the upcoming production of “Mary Stuart/Maria Stuarda”, a German play by Friedrich von Schiller, translated into Filipino by Allan Pallileo and to be directed by Tony Mabesa.

The open auditions will be on September 11-12, 6-9 p.m., at the Teatro Hermogenes Yllagan Faculty Center, UP Diliman, Quezon City.

“Mary Stuart/Maria Stuarda” is a dramatization of the historic clash of two strong-willed women, Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots. It will run November 18-December 6, 2009 at the Wilfredo Ma. Guerrero Theatre, Palma Hall, UP Diliman, Q.C. as part of Dulaang UP's 34th season.

For inquiries, text/call Cat Aldeon at 0906-5777921.


Thursday, September 10, 2009

Chiz Escudero: missing the forest for the trees

[I]f ever he made up his mind, [Senator Francis] Escudero said there was zero probability of him teaming up with Villar due to the C-5 double funding controversy the former Senate president was embroiled in.

Escudero declared his commitment to good governance and... said his conscience would not allow him to team up with Villar.

He said he would rather run with former president Joseph Estrada, who supported his candidacy for the Senate in 2007.


-- “Escudero: Yes to team-up with Estrada”

So let me get this straight. Chiz Escudero is hoisting his image and possible candidacy for higher office on the issue of corruption by refusing to associate with Manny Villar. Villar is currently battling charges of anomalous legislative behavior on the Senate floor. His case has yet to be brought to court, his guilt or innocence still far from settled. He may or may not be guilty, but in Escudero's mind, Villar's stench is now so great that it wouldn't be in his best interests to align his stars with the one politician who's been leading in most presidential surveys.

However, Escudero would gladly team up with Erap. As in Joseph Estrada, the ex-president booted out of office and eventually convicted of plunder by a court of law after a trial that lasted more than five years, during which Estrada and his top-flight lawyers enjoyed all the opportunity to present his defense in full. The trial itself was preceded by a closely-watched Senate impeachment process that, while prematurely aborted, brought to light serious proof of crimes and misdemeanors by Estrada and his minions.

The pardon Estrada received from GMA was no absolution; it did not expunge his guilt or declared him innocent of his crimes. On the contrary, the pardon could be given only after he had been convicted in court, after his perfidy had been conclusively established. Officially, irrespective of the presidential remission he now wields with shameless alacrity, Estrada remains the country's first plunderer-president.

How can Escudero justify his professed advocacy for good governance and anti-corruption when he shuns Villar but embraces Estrada?

I happen to be from Sorsogon, the province Escudero represented as a congressman and the home base for his quick leap to the Senate. I am one of his constituents, and he is, in effect, my representative in Congress. Not that I am proud of it. I have never voted for Escudero, and have never bought into his putative promise as a new kind of modern, no-nonsense, trapo-busting politician. His record speaks for the man.

During the height of the Estrada scandals and EDSA II, Escudero stood by Estrada all the way to the end. His only defense against the avalanche of evidence testifying to Estrada's gargantuan incompetence and corruption in office was loyalty--loyalty then, and loyalty now, to the kingpin who had invested in him and helped fast-track his ascent in politics and the celebrity circuit. It's possible he had sincerely believed in Estrada's innocence, which only raises the question--especially in light of his fulminations now: How bad a judge of character is he?

Then, in what was clearly an act of revenge for Supreme Court Chief Justice Hilario Davide's tough, even-handed management of the impeachment trial, Escudero and a bunch of young congressmen under Danding Cojuangco's Nationalist People's Coalition tried to impeach Davide on the flimsiest of grounds. That outrageous act put the country at risk of a full-blown constitutional crisis. Does anyone remember now what Davide's supposed sins were? Does anyone remember, for that matter, that Escudero was one of the leaders of a youthful gang of rising political stars who attempted to hijack the Republic to their bratty, dangerous tantrum, who were perfectly willing to rend this country apart and put it through a potentially disastrous upheaval?

Quite a number have been taken in by Escudero's slick facade--the obvious intelligence, the preternatural calm and self-assurance, the flawless, eloquent command of Filipino. As with most everything else in this sentimental country, he straddles politics and showbiz with ease, and Escudero himself is not shy about banking on his Internet-savvy rock-star status particularly among young people, helped along by vapid media commentators who have hardly called him out on his political behavior. He has compared himself and his youthful politics to US president Barack Obama.

But scratch that PR-buffed persona by examining his history and what do you get? A man so afflicted by myopia that he sees the trees and misses the forest. A man whose moral compass tends to swing not only narrowly but selectively. Every time he rails against GMA for corruption, I remember TV interviews of him strenuously defending Estrada when his favorite president's Boracay mansion was all over the news. When he slams the Arroyos' lavish spending, I remember NOT hearing him condemn the Bacchanalian lifestyle that Erap and his cronies indulged in. And now that he sees fit to twit Villar for his supposedly crooked ways, he then proclaims his fealty to the biggest plunderer this country has managed to convict so far.

Estrada, GMA, Villar--all of them reek of rot and corruption, if by varying degrees. If Escudero were the least bit intellectually honest, if he were even half-serious about promoting the new kind of clean, honest, conscientious governance that he has loudly pledged his brand of public service to, he'd be denouncing ALL of them, and not only those whose political patronage has not been as generous or accommodating enough to earn his tribalistic sense of loyalty and gratitude.

A plague on all their houses. But reserve an extra swarm of locusts and frogs for a hypocrite like Francis Escudero.

Dramatis Personae mounts stage adaptation of 2005 film The Exorcism of Emily Rose

Dramatis Personae and La Consolacion College Manila’s Center for Theater Education/Training and Digital Cinema present the stage adaptation of the film "The Exorcism of Emily Rose," opening Sept. 11, with two matinees, 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., at Mother Consuelo Barcelo Theater, La Consolacion College Mendiola, Manila.

Based on a true story that happened in a small town in Germany, "The Exorcism of Emily Rose" explores the universal clash between medical science and religion. An exorcist priest is accused of negligent homicide by the district attorney for allowing the death of Emily while in the middle of an exorcism. A topnotch agnostic lawyer sets out to defend the priest. The lives of three people will intersect and change forever in this gripping drama about spiritual awakening and redemption.

Directed by Lito Casaje, the play features Jao Mapa, Suzette Ranillo, Alfonso Deza, Joel Caballero, Shyr Valdez, Earl Ignacio, Danny Magisa, Juno Parungao, Marlon Hofer and Angel Rose Reyes, and introducing Tricia Perez as Emily Rose.

Call 0928-2070827/0906-4974025; e-mail carlitocasaje@yahoo.com.


Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Alexis Tioseco and 'the difficult art of being human'

(Eulogy delivered by Paul Dumol at the funeral of Alexis Tioseco and his girlfriend Nika Bohinc at the Santuario de San Antonio, Forbes Park, Makati, September 5, 2009. Mr. Dumol, the VP for Academic Affairs of the University of Asia and the Pacific, where Alexis taught, is the playwright behind the seminal modernist Filipino play “Ang Paglilitis ni Mang Serapio”.)


Alexis was never my student, and although I have been often called his mentor, I was never “officially” his mentor. In our university, students are assigned a faculty member called their “mentor”; I was never that. Leon Peckson introduced Alexis to me—seven years ago, he says, to discuss how we might put together a film appreciation group. From then on Alexis and I met frequently, mostly to talk about movies, because Alexis loved to talk about movies and he could talk on the subject for hours, though not about movie stars or Gloria Swanson moments; he liked to talk about directors and what they wanted to say and how they said it.

In some respects, he was like a son to me. I balk at saying this, but I think it is the truth. At a certain point, I realized his questions about movies we had both seen were intended to just let me speak, while he listened. He was learning. And so I “poured it on,” pulled out all the stops, and told him everything I knew about film and scriptwriting and why this film was good, this other pretentious, this one failed, this other subtle, etc. He started introducing me to directors he knew: there was Quark, then Khavn, Ato, Raya, Sherad. He would pose a question to me before the lunch guest, then sit back, listening: he was learning. I, on the other hand, squirmed. He would lend me DVDs of local films, then discuss them with me. I rarely gave anyone an A. In those lunches, he would put me on the spot and ask me to repeat what I had told him and never would tell the director face to face, like a good Filipino. At a certain point, I told him to stop, because he was turning all his friends into my enemies. (Hyperbole here!) The annoyance of some of these directors was palpable, but I felt obliged to speak, afraid he would accuse me of backbiting or even duplicity, if I did not let directors know what I really thought about their movies. He was learning.

In the early years of our conversations, we talked a lot about his career in film. At first, he entertained plans of writing for the movies, but perhaps I squelched that with my reactions to the first storyline he wrote. It was awful. Eventually, he focused on film criticism and film scholarship. Circumstances directed him to Southeast Asia cinema as his niche. We discussed possible graduate studies.

I do not know what sort of influence I was in his life or even more specifically in his film criticism. Perhaps nothing. But I know I was part of his process of growth, of finding his own voice, of shaping his convictions. Once the film teachers had a workshop which I led, and we analyzed a particular scene in “In the Mood for Love”. I was sorely disappointed by the overly-symbolistic interpretation he made of a swinging lightbulb. I knew that was an influence that came from elsewhere, not from me. That’s what I mean when I say my influence may have been nil. He never submitted drafts of his articles or reviews to me, and I did not ask to see them. I am a strong believer in each one developing his own personality.

The seven years I knew him were the years in which he became what he is now. I saw the transformation of his passion for cinema into a cause, a cause that came with a love for the Philippines and Southeast Asia. Crucial to his career as film critic was a favor Lav Diaz asked of him: to fill in for him in an international conference in Singapore on independent films; he would speak on the Philippines. By that time, he was quite familiar with the situation of independent cinema here through the lengthy interviews he had made of film directors. After that conference, invitations to others came steadily. Alexis’s specialization in Southeast Asian independent cinema filled a need. But I do not think he had developed his own philosophy of the cinema at the time of his death; he was in the process of doing this. Alexis never had formal training in film, and for some time we discussed whether he should pursue film studies or Southeast Asian studies. He tended to the latter, but circumstances conspired to prevent him from taking any step in that direction.

A crucial event in shaping his career was his father’s death. We talked quite a bit about his father and his relations with him. This was topic no. 2 after movies, and after his dad died, for a short time the way he ran the family business became topic no. 2. In both cases I gave Alexis advice I felt a father would. After he started teaching part time at UA&P, we saw each other less, and over the last year quite infrequently.

Alexis lived alone with his dad when I knew him, and his father—how shall I put it?—was like a character from a short story by Nick Joaquin. Alexis had a complex relationship with him, but he loved him, and it was then I saw his sense of duty tested. He stayed by his dad. He wanted to write a screenplay about him and secretly audio-taped the sermons his dad would make to him. I told him the movie should be a comedy. His father wasn’t friendly to his dreams of a career in film criticism—an entirely understandable attitude on the part of a parent, I must say. Besides, he wanted Alexis to take over the family business. In the end he stopped insisting Alexis run the business and allowed him to teach film at the University. When his father fell ill, Alexis took care of his father.

His father’s death three years ago led to his having to manage the family business selling LPGs, which meant teaching part time, instead of full time, in UA&P. By then Alexis was attending international conferences regularly. And then came Nika, who swept him off his feet with her beauty. I recall him describing her, fresh from his trip to Slovenia. He was in love. Absolutely in love. Say something about Nika, someone told me last night. I don’t know her, though I did have the pleasure of dining with her and Alexis thrice. She struck me as a fiercely intelligent woman, a mulier fortis, who loved the mountain-climbing excursion Philip Peckson took her and Alexis on on the hottest day possible of the year, while Alexis kept complaining about how his legs were turning into jelly. Like Alexis she had her own advocacy work on film in Slovenia; like him she edited a film magazine, although hers was in print.

Alexis was never mean. He never indulged in gossip, backbiting, or vain remarks. Even when he was, it seemed, a regular in the international conference circuit, he never put on airs. He was always himself, as he had always been, simple, cheerful, usually with a smile on his face.

He never used people and their films as stepping-stones for his own ambitions. Sometimes you have that impression that someone is using research in a particular field, not because of any real interest in the area, but only to establish himself as resident expert. Well, Alexis was not like that. He had a genuine passion for the cinema, and in time this narrowed down to Philippine independent films, before broadening to include the independent cinema of the rest of Southeast Asia. He disliked what he would refer to dismissively as Hollywood, which meant that he never watched any of the parts of “The Lord of the Rings”.

Every now and then in our conversations he would mention this or that person about whom he was concerned: Lav and his health, Chris, Erwin. He wouldn’t expand on them. He would mention them briefly, but over time I learned that meant he was trying to do something for them.

He was an apostle of the cinema. He loved the films of Lav and is probably the only film teacher in the whole world who persuaded almost an entire class to sit through the 11 hours of “Ebolusyon”. He loved Raya’s films, and I recall his enthusiasm for Ato’s first film and Sherad’s first, his excitement over Khavn’s advocacy for digital films, Quark’s “Keka”.

Alexis’ attempts at learning Tagalog were painful to hear, and I admired his stubbornness in getting his pronunciation right. He loved the Philippines, which many deride. I recall early in our acquaintance how he wrestled over the option of going back to Canada where there was more funding for film research. In the end, he opted for the Philippines, because he agreed that it was here where he could make a real contribution, and he threw himself into his new advocacy with, I am tempted to say, the hard work and thoroughness he did not care to show in his work on communications or management in UA&P.

On our way to Makati yesterday, Chris Yambing mentioned how Alexis in these few days had seemed to become a phenomenon. Chris put it very well: he expected a lot of people to be strongly affected by Alexis’s death; what he did not expect was the magnitude. How account for it? There is his work on film, of course, and there is also his use of the electronic media. But I think what we see demonstrated here is simply the power of friendliness—a completely disarming friendliness, wherever he was, and in the last five years of his life, he traveled much and met many people. It wasn’t charm; he wasn’t oily; he wouldn’t turn anything on or off. He was simply friendly—this, combined with a genuine interest in film.

Alexis was polite, respectful. He never made fun of others, never derided them, never sneered at them. He was never vicious in his criticism. He strove for correctness whether in praising or criticizing. He had an Anglo-Saxon concern for fairness and a fine sense of justice. And woe to you if you happened to make a remark which seemed to him unfair or unjust. He would not contradict you head-on. That was not Alexis’s style: he would ask questions, one after the other, until he made you see the unfairness or injustice tucked away in the remark. Alexis was forthright in his speech but always very polite and respectful. He was not impulsive, but not too deliberate either. “Mas bueno que el pan,” the Spaniards would say.

When Erwin informed me about his death, one of the messages he sent by text was how senseless his death was. I agreed, and added “like so many other things” in this country that Alexis and I and so many others love. This is like a Tarantino film, I thought, but in a Tarantino film even what seems senseless makes sense in the end once the film is completed. Many years ago I wrote a play which was produced in the CCP. The director told me how one of the cast members watched the play from the audience side instead of from the side lines. His comment was, “Maganda pala ang play natin.” It is necessary to see the whole script to appreciate it. It is necessary to see the story completed to judge its parts. If all we see is the scenes we appear in, the play can appear senseless, even if it is not.

Last night, talking to Philip, who described his friendship with Alexis as one of passionate arguments over film after which they would not talk for two days and after which they would be friends again—Alexis was that way: you could cross him, even absolutely, and know this was something he was not going to take against you forever more—talking to Philip, we considered once more something that whispered comments in the wake have suggested now and then, that there’s something more than meets the eye here, something more than a break-in and robbery. Perhaps. Perhaps we have witnessed a scene from someone else’s script, one we are not familiar with. We shudder to consider that someone might hate our Alexis. But Alexis was not only a film critic. That was only one hat. The suggestion that Alexis’s death might not be senseless after all, that it is part of a story most of us in this church are unaware of, is disturbing. We can only hope that the proper investigations will be held.

There is another sense of course in which we are all characters in a film going on right now. And in this film, even if the proper investigations unearth the truth, the episode we have just lived through can still strike us as senseless. But that is because we do not know the whole script and because we do not know the ending of this movie. We do not even know what was going through Alexis’s head as those bullets ended his life. John Woo’s slo-mo treatment of bullets is confirmed by police officers relating their experiences at shoot-outs: time slows down, and one finds oneself thinking a multitude of thoughts which would ordinarily seem impossible to compress into a few seconds.

Last night Philip told me that Erwin Romulo was hoping this eulogy would tell you something about Alexis’ spirituality. I replied he would be disappointed. Alexis maintained a reserve about the subject. He was no atheist, and he was no agnostic, and you can sense this in his writings, but he kept silent about the topic once it drifted towards his own personal life. I respected that silence, because Alexis is someone who always listened and thought. There was little he would do that was not deliberate. I can say that he prayed for his father regularly during what he did not know at the time to be the last years of his father’s life, and he prayed for his mother, too. I know because he told me.

So I do not think the suggestion about a Scriptwriter with a capital S of the film we are living through would make Alexis turn over in his coffin. You can check right now. I do not think he would disagree that that Scriptwriter is compassionate and wise beyond our imagination and our understanding. Or that the ending to this film we are living through will be correct and that in its light we will understand everything that now seems senseless and that the ending of this movie will and can be only absolutely beautiful.

What is clear right now is that his death has reinforced something we also experienced only recently, with the death of that other person who lived in his neighborhood: The power of ideas, the power of example. Alexis was not a political person, although he graciously agreed to organize a lunch in which I made a PowerPoint presentation to Lav and Khavn and Sherad about my analysis of what our society is going through. Nika was in that lunch, sick, but she was listening, more intently I thought than Alexis. With time she might have made him political. The idea that movies, good movies, reveal to us what it means to be human—and Alexis was, if anything, a humanist; he was no ideologue—this is something Alexis believed in, as you might see in four movies he introduced me to and are now among my favorites: “In the Mood for Love”, “Amores Perros”, “Yi Yi”, and Bresson’s “Au Hasard, Balthazar”. He loved these movies for the same thing he loved in Lav’s movies and the same thing he looked for in Southeast Asian independent films.

Thank you for that, Alexis, because art revitalizes, and every time I watch these films and experience the grace which art brings, I will be thankful for your persuasive enthusiasm. Thank you, above all, for demonstrating with your own life what you loved most in film: the difficult art of being human, how to be kind and generous and respectful and cheerful and honest and hardworking and friendly to all without, it seems to me, exception.


PLUS: More heartbroken tributes in Noel Vera's blog, but especially Oggs', Jason Sanders', the great critic Jonathan Rosenbaum's and Noel's, too. Also, this gem by Gabe Klinger, and here a corker by Lourd de Veyra.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search this blog or the Web

Loading...